<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From Money to Quicken&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spencer.stantonfamilyonline.com/blog/2009/06/27/from-money-to-quicken/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spencer.stantonfamilyonline.com/blog/2009/06/27/from-money-to-quicken/</link>
	<description>A blog from the mind of Spencer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 00:07:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Spencer</title>
		<link>http://spencer.stantonfamilyonline.com/blog/2009/06/27/from-money-to-quicken/comment-page-1/#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator>Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spencer.stantonfamilyonline.com/blog/?p=171#comment-541</guid>
		<description>I am aware they were working on an improved importer but have not tested it or heard any reports.  My guess is that it is probably better, but not a perfect 1 to 1 transition.  I&#039;m not sure how close it gets.  If/when I upgrade to 2010, I may test out the converter on my old Money file.  If I do, I&#039;ll post my comparisons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am aware they were working on an improved importer but have not tested it or heard any reports.  My guess is that it is probably better, but not a perfect 1 to 1 transition.  I&#8217;m not sure how close it gets.  If/when I upgrade to 2010, I may test out the converter on my old Money file.  If I do, I&#8217;ll post my comparisons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://spencer.stantonfamilyonline.com/blog/2009/06/27/from-money-to-quicken/comment-page-1/#comment-540</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spencer.stantonfamilyonline.com/blog/?p=171#comment-540</guid>
		<description>Spencer (and JT if you see this!) great post -- thanks for spending the time to document this for everyone. I&#039;m in the same unfortunate boat and anal-retentive pack rat that I am, will have more accounts, both open and closed, then I care to think about to port into Quicken. My question is, since you guide was written pre-Quicken 2010 release, are you aware of the improvements in the new importer and what precautions we should be taking with it? I&#039;m assuming with 2010 that I won&#039;t be following your process. I was hoping JT above would provide a bit more detail on his experience/dos and donts. My quick Google search on the subject really hasn&#039;t yielded anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spencer (and JT if you see this!) great post &#8212; thanks for spending the time to document this for everyone. I&#8217;m in the same unfortunate boat and anal-retentive pack rat that I am, will have more accounts, both open and closed, then I care to think about to port into Quicken. My question is, since you guide was written pre-Quicken 2010 release, are you aware of the improvements in the new importer and what precautions we should be taking with it? I&#8217;m assuming with 2010 that I won&#8217;t be following your process. I was hoping JT above would provide a bit more detail on his experience/dos and donts. My quick Google search on the subject really hasn&#8217;t yielded anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT</title>
		<link>http://spencer.stantonfamilyonline.com/blog/2009/06/27/from-money-to-quicken/comment-page-1/#comment-539</link>
		<dc:creator>JT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 20:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spencer.stantonfamilyonline.com/blog/?p=171#comment-539</guid>
		<description>Well, 12 hours of crunching and I think I&#039;ve completed my transition from Money 08 Premium to Quicken Premier 2010. I wasn&#039;t happy about making the switch...but was without any real options. We have 40-something accounts, so this was pretty tedious. But the new importer sped up the process quite a bit. Most of the day has been spent re-linking the online services and correcting small items from the 45-pages error report the import app generated.

Question for folks that are still following this thread -- the old &quot;category&quot; assignment in Money allowed you to assign a loan payment from a checking account to a pre-setup amortized loan -- it would do all the split category items for your (principal, interest, taxes, hazard insurance, etc). These transactions now just show up as &quot;split&quot; with no way to assign new loan payments to their respective loans...or if there is, I&#039;m just not finding it.

There is a &#039;loan&#039; category, but that doesn&#039;t tie to your actual loans -- same for &#039;mortgage payment&#039; and other categories that are linked to your loans.

Thoughts, anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, 12 hours of crunching and I think I&#8217;ve completed my transition from Money 08 Premium to Quicken Premier 2010. I wasn&#8217;t happy about making the switch&#8230;but was without any real options. We have 40-something accounts, so this was pretty tedious. But the new importer sped up the process quite a bit. Most of the day has been spent re-linking the online services and correcting small items from the 45-pages error report the import app generated.</p>
<p>Question for folks that are still following this thread &#8212; the old &#8220;category&#8221; assignment in Money allowed you to assign a loan payment from a checking account to a pre-setup amortized loan &#8212; it would do all the split category items for your (principal, interest, taxes, hazard insurance, etc). These transactions now just show up as &#8220;split&#8221; with no way to assign new loan payments to their respective loans&#8230;or if there is, I&#8217;m just not finding it.</p>
<p>There is a &#8216;loan&#8217; category, but that doesn&#8217;t tie to your actual loans &#8212; same for &#8216;mortgage payment&#8217; and other categories that are linked to your loans.</p>
<p>Thoughts, anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orion Wood</title>
		<link>http://spencer.stantonfamilyonline.com/blog/2009/06/27/from-money-to-quicken/comment-page-1/#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>Orion Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 05:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spencer.stantonfamilyonline.com/blog/?p=171#comment-537</guid>
		<description>Spencer,

I just want to thank you for your help.  I made the transition, and now I am a happy user of Quicken.

Yes, it was a bit tedious to convert my Money file, and I find that Money Online had two more links for downloads that Quicken does not have.  Fortunately, they are little-used accounts that don&#039;t take too much to update manually.

And there are a few quirks in Quicken, such as the Categories.  Money would find the category for a subcategory when you entered it (like &quot;Fuel&quot;), but Quicken makes you choose the category, then select the subcategory.  But other features I like; the search mechanism in Quicken is faster and much more intuitive.

I think I am fine now, still learning, but without your excellent instructions, I would have been in a big bind.

If you get this, just let me know at orionw@pacbell.net.

Thanks again!!

Orion Wood</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spencer,</p>
<p>I just want to thank you for your help.  I made the transition, and now I am a happy user of Quicken.</p>
<p>Yes, it was a bit tedious to convert my Money file, and I find that Money Online had two more links for downloads that Quicken does not have.  Fortunately, they are little-used accounts that don&#8217;t take too much to update manually.</p>
<p>And there are a few quirks in Quicken, such as the Categories.  Money would find the category for a subcategory when you entered it (like &#8220;Fuel&#8221;), but Quicken makes you choose the category, then select the subcategory.  But other features I like; the search mechanism in Quicken is faster and much more intuitive.</p>
<p>I think I am fine now, still learning, but without your excellent instructions, I would have been in a big bind.</p>
<p>If you get this, just let me know at <a href="mailto:orionw@pacbell.net">orionw@pacbell.net</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks again!!</p>
<p>Orion Wood</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spencer</title>
		<link>http://spencer.stantonfamilyonline.com/blog/2009/06/27/from-money-to-quicken/comment-page-1/#comment-528</link>
		<dc:creator>Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 02:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spencer.stantonfamilyonline.com/blog/?p=171#comment-528</guid>
		<description>My string pretty much ended with these four posts.  If you have any questions, feel free to ask.  I thought there may be more interest, but it is still a tedious task so I may have overestimated that a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My string pretty much ended with these four posts.  If you have any questions, feel free to ask.  I thought there may be more interest, but it is still a tedious task so I may have overestimated that a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orion Wood</title>
		<link>http://spencer.stantonfamilyonline.com/blog/2009/06/27/from-money-to-quicken/comment-page-1/#comment-527</link>
		<dc:creator>Orion Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 15:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spencer.stantonfamilyonline.com/blog/?p=171#comment-527</guid>
		<description>Spencer,

I got your guide, and I think I can follow it.  Is there any more on this, or did your string end with these four posts several months ago.

Orion</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spencer,</p>
<p>I got your guide, and I think I can follow it.  Is there any more on this, or did your string end with these four posts several months ago.</p>
<p>Orion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The J</title>
		<link>http://spencer.stantonfamilyonline.com/blog/2009/06/27/from-money-to-quicken/comment-page-1/#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>The J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 07:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spencer.stantonfamilyonline.com/blog/?p=171#comment-499</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m always surprised when Microsoft throws in the towel on a software package they hold such a large market stake in (unless it has the Windows attached to it).
Glad you figured out a way to make it work. Seems like your not alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m always surprised when Microsoft throws in the towel on a software package they hold such a large market stake in (unless it has the Windows attached to it).<br />
Glad you figured out a way to make it work. Seems like your not alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spencer</title>
		<link>http://spencer.stantonfamilyonline.com/blog/2009/06/27/from-money-to-quicken/comment-page-1/#comment-498</link>
		<dc:creator>Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 03:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spencer.stantonfamilyonline.com/blog/?p=171#comment-498</guid>
		<description>Well, Quicken does have a Data Converter based on exporting a couple of reports from Money, but even that left a lot to be desired.

Unfortunately, there is still an account-by-account export from Money to QIF and metadata doesn&#039;t come over either.  I did create a way to import the QIF data a little faster, and the guide will help avoid pitfalls of the manual portions, but is was still a lot of manual work.  Right now there doesn&#039;t seem to be a way around it.  I hope to have the first draft posted tonight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Quicken does have a Data Converter based on exporting a couple of reports from Money, but even that left a lot to be desired.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, there is still an account-by-account export from Money to QIF and metadata doesn&#8217;t come over either.  I did create a way to import the QIF data a little faster, and the guide will help avoid pitfalls of the manual portions, but is was still a lot of manual work.  Right now there doesn&#8217;t seem to be a way around it.  I hope to have the first draft posted tonight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B.J. Stanton</title>
		<link>http://spencer.stantonfamilyonline.com/blog/2009/06/27/from-money-to-quicken/comment-page-1/#comment-497</link>
		<dc:creator>B.J. Stanton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 03:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spencer.stantonfamilyonline.com/blog/?p=171#comment-497</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m in the same boat, Buddy!  Took a quick look at the effort required to port Money data to Quicken, and it is ugly to say the least.  I too wanted a turnkey method to bring everything into Quicken with a relatively painless process.  But all I have found so far is a tedious, account-by-account export from Money to a QIF format.  No mention of a way to port any of Money&#039;s metadata (e.g. list of payees).  Any help you provide will be most appreciated!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in the same boat, Buddy!  Took a quick look at the effort required to port Money data to Quicken, and it is ugly to say the least.  I too wanted a turnkey method to bring everything into Quicken with a relatively painless process.  But all I have found so far is a tedious, account-by-account export from Money to a QIF format.  No mention of a way to port any of Money&#8217;s metadata (e.g. list of payees).  Any help you provide will be most appreciated!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chong</title>
		<link>http://spencer.stantonfamilyonline.com/blog/2009/06/27/from-money-to-quicken/comment-page-1/#comment-496</link>
		<dc:creator>Chong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 23:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spencer.stantonfamilyonline.com/blog/?p=171#comment-496</guid>
		<description>Great post. Found you via a search in Bing. I am in the same boat, chose Money 6 yrs ago. Look forward to your guide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. Found you via a search in Bing. I am in the same boat, chose Money 6 yrs ago. Look forward to your guide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
